Alfs 9:09 Thu Jun 7
Maths question
|
|
Bet stars are offering £100 million for predicting the W, L, D, result of every World Cup game.
With 64 ties to be played how many would need to be in a syndicate to cover every possible outcome?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Hermit Road
9:32 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Those 16 games in the knockout stages still have 3 possible outcomes with betting on football matches normally based on 90 minutes plus injury time.
|
Mike Oxsaw
8:54 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Wouldn't know, me...
|
Westham67
4:15 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
hahaha You mean get done each way?
|
Mike Oxsaw
4:03 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Just start a bukkake thread 67, we know you want to...
|
Westham67
3:48 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Cover ourselves and do it each way
|
Dowies Love Child
1:41 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Actually that is not correct as there are not 64 games with three potential outcomes.
There are 48 games with three outcomes (W,L,D) and 16 with two outcomes (W,L) in the knockout stages.
So if they want the results not the score at end of normal time the calculation is (3^48)*(2^16)
or 5.22757*10E27
Hope that helps.
|
gph
12:59 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Women are statistically better at multitasking than men, which doesn't mean that all women are better than all men at it.
Also, men tend to believe this when it comes to, say, ironing and fellatio, but not when it comes to steering a car and keeping an eye on the traffic.
|
,
12:55 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
Rachel Riley is really very good at maths so perhaps whilst she is fellating pikey she could be multi tasking [ because that's waht women are better then men at........alledgedly ] and working out the shade of odds required.
|
jack flash
12:51 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
The plan to form a syndicate to cover all possible outcomes or the plan to get Rachel Riley to suck geoffpikey's cock?
Either plan is likely to be in tatters I suppose
|
jack flash
12:51 Fri Jun 8
Re: Maths question
|
The plan to form a syndicate to cover all possible outcomes or the plan to get Rachel Riley to suck geoffpikey's cock?
Either plan is likely to be in tatters I suppose
|
Alfs
11:01 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
Oh well. That plan is in tatters.
|
Mart O
10:37 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
Who is Rachel Riley, and does she suck (smallish) cocks ?
|
On The Ball
10:26 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
We can cover that in WHO usernames (between the six of us)
|
geoffpikey
10:22 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
There's a better chance of Rachel Riley sucking my cock until I finish reciting the number Pi.
|
wurzel
10:14 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
It'd be even more if they wanted the correct scores....
|
BRANDED
10:09 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
Should we have a go?
|
Far Cough
9:34 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
A Sagan
As a humorous tribute to Carl Sagan and his association with the catchphrase "billions and billions", a sagan has been defined as a unit of measurement equivalent to a very large number – technically at least four billion (two billion plus two billion) – of anything.
|
Hermit Road
9:26 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
three nonillion, four hundred thirty-three octillion, six hundred eighty-three septillion, eight hundred twenty sextillion, two hundred ninety-two quintillion, five hundred twelve quadrillion, four hundred eighty-four trillion, six hundred fifty-seven billion, eight hundred forty-nine million, eighty-nine thousand, two hundred eighty-one
|
gph
9:25 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
"If you get the rest, I'll be the 1 at the end."
Changed my mind - the last slot's bound to have the Final down as a draw/
|
gph
9:20 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
Fucking big
|
Hermit Road
9:19 Thu Jun 7
Re: Maths question
|
What’s that in words?
|
| 
